Pages

Wednesday 30 November 2016

Youtube: Broadcast Yourself!

Do you want to be the next Steven Spielberg or Stanley Kubrick? YouTube offers everyone a platform to broadcast themselves and create videos so I decided to play around with the Youtube video editor.

You don’t even need to upload any actual movies to give it a go. There are a few creative commons clips and soundbites which anyone can use.

Below I have embedded my practice attempt.  I decided to try and create a little narrative by featuring night shots. I was particularly impressed with the depth of field shots available which changed the focus of the lens. In terms of editing it is quite quick and simple to use. You can trim clips manually  by using the razor tool and place text on top of them to create a title.



The editor also allows you to place transitions into the timeline in order to connect the clips together. There is a large selection of wipes available allowing you to emulate George Lucas and his silly style of editing.




While it was fun to use the editor ultimately it is very basic and it is nothing compared to Adobe Premier Pro which is used by a lot of Youtubers for editing their videos. However, it acts as nice introduction for beginners and people new to the experience. 

Monday 21 November 2016

Power of a Picture


During reading week, I navigated my way up north to the Metro Radio Arena which was hosting  Film and Comic Con Newcastle.  I had a press pass for the event, so I had the opportunity to look around and talk to some of the guests.  There were large crowds, many of whom were dressed in various costumes from different pieces of cinema.

Furthermore, while I was there I managed to take a few pictures on my phone as well. For this blog post I picked out one photo in particular to explore in further detail which I have posted below.

This is a picture of Derek Lewis. He used to make models as a hobby in his spare time. However, he gave up his job to pursue his passion full time.  All of these models on display in the picture were created by Derek, and I thought it was really intriguing.


Overall pictures can be really powerful as they can illustrate a story in a visual manner. They can be used to   exhibit a large quantity of items as in this case.  They can act as a nice addition to a written piece because they can help add depth to a story.

Saturday 5 November 2016

Twitter

 Twitter is taking over. Sky News seem to be obsessed with the stuff. Every time a story breaks you can see a presenter waving their tablet around and getting all excited at the sound of some instant reaction.  The big bird has spread its wings especially with the ability for companies to gauge public opinion.

Why is Twitter so popular? Anyone can read a tweet. You don’t even need an account.  Although if you do you can join in the discussion providing you say something in 140 characters or less.
Twitter is brilliant for journalism. It allows you to enter the same space as professional people.  You can watch stories break online. For example, this week the Williams F1 team announced their new driver line up… via Twitter.



The ability to pin tweets is also important. You can pick your favourite quote and keep it at the top of your profile. No need to go searching.



I tried to share my Twitter profile on my Facebook and I encountered some interesting results. My profile picture had been replaced by an egg and the caption was written in Swedish for some reason.  Clearly they don’t like cross platform promotion and this shows the increasing strength of the site.

Friday 4 November 2016

Batman V Superman Review

 “The world only makes sense if you force it to,” utters Ben Affleck’s Batman.  It’s a line pulled straight from Frank Millers’s comic The Dark Knight Returns which inspired the film and it sums up the reception upon its release.
Batman V Superman divided critics, but having recently acquired the standard DVD release I thought I’d give it another watch.

Many people feared that Affleck would be an ineffective as the Caped Crusader, but he held the film together. His interactions with Jeremy Irons Alfred was one of the highlights. The relationship between the butler and Batman added a bit of heart and warmth to a very dark story. Alfred acts as a father figure, and it’s a shame that he does not feature more in the movie as his wit is well received.

 The fighting style employed by Batman is impressive. It is clearly inspired by the Arkham Asylum game. In the past Batman could barely turn his head, but in this film he had no problem hurling people about. The ‘World’s Greatest Detective’ actually gets to use his intuition for once as he goes in search of kryptonite rather than having it handed it to him on the plate by the plot.

The film has many problems. It is simply too long. Some people say that the ultimate edition is better, but there is no way on can justify adding more depth when it drags on in the theatrical cut. One only listen to Jesse Eisenbergs ramblings for so long.  I preferred his performance in Zombieland.

 There are some nice set pieces such as the amazing introduction scene in Metropolis. Despite the strong start the film becomes more muddled as it progresses. Too many strands have been shoved into this story. It tries to set up the Justice League, and please comic book fans. There is nothing wrong with that, but the execution is poor in some parts. The dream sequences of dystopian futures feel very out of place.  While these scenes are impressive to watch, they add nothing to the plot and maybe they should have been saved for a future film.

While this feature was billed as a sequel to Man of Steel I find it interesting how little Superman has to offer. While Henry Carvill can play a very convincing Clark Kent he is often overshadowed by his co-star.

Batman V Superman has some electrifying elements, but also moments of madness. The pace is all over the place, but there is enough good stuff in there to make it worth watching.  Although for some that is not enough for Frank Miller as when asked the about the film by Variety  his response was a rather sarcastic “Your welcome!”

Thursday 3 November 2016

Seven Deadly Sins Review

David Walsh was an influential figure in exposing Lance Armstrong’s lies.  In many sports we see rivalries between competitors, but the relationship between the Sunday Times journalist and the man stripped of his seven Tour de France Titles is fascinating. The two had many encounters and the chase played out like a game of cat and mouse.  

The title is inspired by the David Fincher film Se7en . While Armstrong is the focus, Walsh explores his own background and the events that would influence his investigative journalism. This includes his reporting of Sean Kelly and Stephen Roche, idolised by the Irish, but also tainted by allegations of doping. Furthermore, the book also includes anecdotes from other sports such as the infamous swimmer Irish  Michelle Smith who won a gold medal at the 1996 Olympics

Walsh also had to overcome some personal tragedies and the book is very thought provoking. His interactions with Armstrong are challenging and at times it seems like an uphill struggle.  Walsh tried to exposure Armstrong who in turn tried to discredit and demonize him.  In the end, Walsh is vindicated in that famous Oprah interview where Armstrong finally comes clean.

The science behind the systematic doping is also explained very well by Walsh. The information is easily accessible for those who may not be too familiar with  the sport. 

This book was a fantastic find. I’ve already read it twice since I picked it up in spring.  I would recommend it to anybody who wanted to find out more about the Armstrong era of cycling.  It has also recently been adapted into a feature film called the Programme. While I haven't seen it yet I definitely want to give it a watch.

Wednesday 2 November 2016

Drugs and Deception: The Armstrong Lie Review

Racing around the streets of Monaco Lance Armstrong could have been be mistaken for a machine from the Grand Prix. Like its mechanical counterpart cycling has its own formula for winning although this one contained some unwritten rules.


The film follows Lance Armstrong’s attempt at a comeback in 2009. The 7 time Tour de France winner wanted to prove the doubters wrong once and for all. However, in his desperate bid to reclaim the yellow jersey he brought about the start of his own downfall.

Documentary director Alex Gibney was with Lance throughout the entire 2009 Tour and even he was hoodwinked by the whole affair.  While he was aware of past doping allegations Armstrong convinced him otherwise. After all he had exclusive access to the star. Gibney thought he was making a feel-good film for all the family. The film explained key cycling concepts so that it could be accessed by all.  It was only when he was exposed in 2012 did Armstrong finally sit down and set the record straight.

Armstrong could stare straight into the camera and defiantly say that he did not use drugs.  He claimed to use science and natural methods supplied by the controversial Dr Michele Ferrari, nicknamed Schumi after F1 driver Michael Schumacher. If you can convince yourself then you can convince anyone.  It’s ironic how when Armstrong eventually admits the drug taking truth in the aftermath he looks even more uncomfortable.  Rather than lifting the weight off his shoulders you can see it crashing down as his illusion is smashed and reality kicks in.


While Armstrong finished 3rd in the 2009 Tour it came at a cost as the results of a doping test in that race would ultimately come back to
destroy his legacy.  The all smiling Ferrari was hidden in plain sight although it turns out that he was “personification of the dark side of cycling” in the words of writer Daniel Coyle.  

The editing employed is quite clever when combined with the emotional score. Gibney is very good at presenting both sides of the argument and the film is well organised. The ability to ride clean as opposed to actually being able to compete is openly explored.  


Overall the film is very good introduction to the Armstrong era. It asks questions and explores the consequences of Armstrong’s unethical actions.  While Armstrong is the antihero with name recognition he is overshadowed by Michele Ferrari who is the real puppet master. A Coyle quote sums him up well as “He is a scientist and that’s one of the bits that gets lost in all of this.”

Tuesday 1 November 2016

Facebook Live: Different Dimensions


This Gareth Southgate press conferences shows how Facebook Live is used by the media for journalism.

I had a go at Facebook Live for the first time. The actual application was very easy to load up as it can be accessed via the Facebook app.

The software also included the ability to switch between the front and rear cameras at the touch of a button. This can add a different dimension as you can change perspective which increases the versatility
My attempt at recording with Facebook live

Comments can be seen in real time so people are reacting to the events as they unfold. Furthermore, the like buttons can also be seen streaming down the side as the video progresses. 

Facebook live is utilised heavily by journalists and the mass media. For example the England national football team use it to stream their press conferences. The ability to play back the videos is also key as some people may not be watching as it is recorded.

However, in terms of wide spread use it is not that commonly employed . It can be a bit of a hassle to steady the camera and mistakes can’t be edited out while recording although changes can be made afterwards when it is reposted.

Facebook Live is an interesting piece of technology that can help journalists reach a wide audience via social media, however most people tend to watch the videos rather than stream live themselves.